A GenAI deployment risked repeating an earlier failure pattern — shipped on stakeholder assumption, then quietly rejected by the people it was meant to support.
An internal GenAI chatbot was being designed for account managers without a grounded view of where conversational AI would actually help versus add friction in a high-context B2B sales workflow.
Enterprise research engagements were bottlenecked at recruiting — niche B2B audiences, compliance-sensitive participant pools, and inconsistent intake from client teams stretched study timelines and put insight quality at risk.
Designers, researchers, and content strategists were rebuilding the same artifacts across product lines because brand assets, research evidence, and design system tokens lived in disconnected tools.
Running an inclusive accessibility study still means stitching together heuristics, assistive-tech walkthroughs, and a spreadsheet of evidence — none of which speak to each other or to accessibility conformance criteria in one place.